Confessions Of A Political Junkie: Clinton and the United Nations

October 21, 2004

Clinton and the United Nations

Kerry … risks … the disruption of a longterm rule of diplomatic etiquette.

Reports are circulating that Bill Clinton wants to be the next Secretary-General of the United Nations. Here's why that is not going to happen.

The United Nations has several unwritten rules, precedents, and traditions that keep the peace within the organization (not that Clinton considers such things sacred). One of those traditions is that the appointment of the Secretary-General rotates around the world. Right now it's Africa's turn. It is widely considered to be Asia's turn next. China is reported backing, along with US support, a Thai diplomat.

Another even more important unwritten rule is this:

Past secretaries general have come from various regions of the world, but it is an unwritten rule that they never should come from one of the most powerful countries. This tradition is a response to concerns that a secretary general selected from such a country would not be perceived by other nations as objective or neutral. There is also a fear that such a selection would give the world’s most influential nations that much more power.

While Clinton has shown little regard in the past for tradition and unwritten rules, this rule has been fairly rock solid. Popular former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney was rejected for the role because Africa demanded it's turn. After the US vetoed Butro-Butros Gali's second five year term, Kofi Annan was chosen to honor the tradition of having one region keep the Secretariat for two terms.

Even without the unwritten diplomatic rules of the United Nations, there is another reason this won't happen. While Kerry might want to use the idea for political value during the campaign, it is doubtful he would want Clinton upstaging him on the world stage, likewise with Bush.

All in all, this is most likely just a political ploy to put Clinton's name out front, build good will for the former President, and link him to Kerry for Kerry's benefit. In the end, however, Kerry, should he embrace the idea for political gain, risks showing his lack of international statemanship by advocating the disruption of a longterm rule of diplomatic etiquette.

Posted by Erick at October 21, 2004 10:13 PM | TrackBack

'Unwritten rule'? Yeah. THAT makes sense. The world needs unwritten rules.

The Redskins win/loss link to the Presidency has now gone by the wayside

The BoSox choke rule has gone by the wayside.

So this stupid rule needs to go by the wayside. The best man for the job needs to get the job. Period.

And I'm NOT sayin' that's Clinton, yo. I'm sure there are others who can do the job. Like Silent Bob, maybe...

Posted by: Mikeyb at November 19, 2004 06:23 PM

What happens when it's North America's turn? Does Mexico automatically get the seat since the Demokkkratic Republik of Canuckistan (and the US) are both members of the G8? Or would they try that crap where all of a sudden Panama and Honduras are part of North America?

Posted by: Bronchial Statue at November 19, 2004 02:08 PM

I believe, should Bill Clinton become the next UN head, it will be exactly what the world body needs right now. Imagine the prominence and the exposure.... but the time honored traditions at the UN should not be trampled upon

Posted by: Modou Carnagie at October 23, 2004 08:42 PM

The U.N. job is not BIG enough for Bill. He should be appointed the POPE, and HILLARY should be MARY.. two of this centuries biggest con-men.

Posted by: lou polett at October 22, 2004 04:58 PM

Can you imagine what it would be like if the U.S. got into a spat with the U.N. with Clinton in charge? Holy crap!

Not to mention just how berzerk the wingnut wing of the right would go.

Posted by: Dean Esmay at October 22, 2004 12:58 AM
Post a comment

Remember personal info?